Talk:Tetrasomy X/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg (talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I will be reviewing this article. As usual, comments will be made soon. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All claims are cited
All images are sourced properly
It would be better if this article had more images, but the ones currently are minimally sufficient for GA.
Earwig copyvio report came back clean.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

This article meets all basic criteria, so I will be promoting it. JackFromReedsburg (talk | contribs) 04:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]