Talk:Test pilot

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Pets

Are we going to start adding everyone's favorite test pilot? I think we need to keep this to notable and indisputable ones. We do not need this to become a "List of test pilots." —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:54, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few quibbles. 1) I believe the graph that describes test pilots as working for the military or private companies should be changed to government agencies, the military or private companies. NASA and the FAA have test pilots. 2) The list of test pilots should be ordered in some way. Alphabetical, chronological, height... 3) Yeager's entry should probably say "credited" instead of "known" and I would add "in level flight" — Tthackrey (talk) 15:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sawyer question

Anyone ever hear of a test pilot killed at Coronado, California, ca. 1946 named Sawyer -- possibly first named Alfred? (anonymous question moved from article). TraceyR 08:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Useful sites

There's a useful site listing a number of test pilots of all nations with short bios of some of them here: Test & Research Pilots, Flight Test Engineers

And for anyone interested in test pilot fatalities there's a fairly comprehensive list of UK ones (with crash details) here: Test Flying Memorial Project —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.250.40 (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Jordan

The fictional Green Lantern is listed in the notable pilots section. Yes, he is a test pilot before he gets his powers, but should fictional people be included here? 2602:304:CE3E:5290:81B2:97EF:9E19:C13D (talk) 04:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Test pilot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Test pilot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513103031/http://www.dnd.ca/aete/default_e.asp to http://www.dnd.ca/aete/default_e.asp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Qualifications

There doesn't seem to be a reference for this section. I'm sure we all agree on the skills but a reference would be good in line with Wikipedia's policy. Flanker235 (talk) 11:35, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable test pilots reverted

I added a number of notable test pilots, many of whom either flew notable types or were notable for other reasons, such as their later careers. Since all of the people I added have their own Wikipedia pages, I suggest this alone is good reason. I understand that this was never intended to be a complete list but that said, there's a better spread of verifiable good information in the linked articles, while the list of qualifications remains unreferenced. Flanker235 (talk) 14:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of test pilots

The article currently has a short list of particularly notable test pilots (as opposed to merely notable enough to have a Wikipedia article). For all test pilots, we have a test pilots category. But should we also have a List of test pilots? cagliost (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]