Talk:Teryl Rothery

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teryl Rothery article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stargate Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Stargate task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Canada: Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment

Close to start-class, but adding some references and fixing the paragraph structure would help there. Wizardman 00:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Head-to-toe photo?

The head-to-toe photo seems to overwhelm the article. Maybe it would better to use just the upper half of the photo (from the waist up). Comments? Richwales 02:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think the photo is ok, since it is thin and of low quality, really we should be looking for a better picture overall.KlickingKarl (talk) 11:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have pictures of her that I took myself when she was a guest at a "Trek Expo" in Tulsa, Oklahoma. It has been awhile since I visited the article, and I see that the same picture is up, and that the request for a better one hasn't been met. By "better", I suppose you mean one in which her eyes or face aren't covered by something, right? Well, I'd share, but I don't know how to do that with pictures. I remember bringing this topic up before, but somehow evidence of my having done so is no longer here. Hmm. How do I share a picture here? LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 08:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC) 08:37, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Teryl Rothery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Diary" dispute

Zucat (talk · contribs) disputes Rothery's own site, and replaced that with a different wholly uncited claim. I've replaced the original reliable source and added the {{disputed inline}} tag. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 00:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no other verified source on the Internet that states she was a part of the film's cast. Also, it's been common knowledge for a decade now that she only appeared in the second film, Roderick Rules. And as I previously said, the source used that says otherwise is incorrect. Zucat (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rothery's own site is either reliable or it isn't. I haven't seen any indication of the latter, but that's what this noticeboard is for determining. If you're sure it's unreliable, then indeed pursue that tack, as 31% of the prose rides upon it. There is no other verified source on the Internet that states […] So you have proof of a negative? Also, it's been common knowledge […] We have a page about that at Wikipedia:Common knowledge. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 18:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to Zacat's edit of 23 October 2021 at 16:23 UTC, the Verifiability policy says, "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." Furthermore, edit summaries such as Somebody use their brain for once. would seem to run afoul of Wikipedia:Civility. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]