Jump to content

Talk:Tert-Butylhydroquinone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives says ingesting 5 grams of TBHQ can be fatal and that one gram can cause dizzyness and nausea. Has anyone else heard/read this from any other sources?? 82.93.133.130 15:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The products that contain the chemical....

[edit]

--222.64.25.33 (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC) Standard No: Q/BTWN01 --222.64.25.33 (talk) 09:50, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toxicological info....

[edit]

--222.64.25.33 (talk) 10:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.64.25.33 (talk) 10:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it true...???

[edit]

--222.64.25.33 (talk) 10:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tert-Butylhydroquinone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


first sentence "highly effective antioxidant" appears to have been sabotaged — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.226.49.228 (talk) 08:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allergen

[edit]

It is suggested to be an allergen. See [1][2]. --Hyperforin (talk) 03:55, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Non-expert non-regular contributor here but, sources 13 and 14 seem... not reliable. Suggest removing the relevant sentences or replacing with better citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.16.228.166 (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems someone removed one of the sources and I've removed the other. Replacements weren't found as there isn't much info out there on TBHQ. Regardless I ask everyone to refrain from citing diet blogs and such in the article. 35drake (talk) 14:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot find evidence of a TBHQ ban

[edit]

There is a sentence on this page that states TBHQ has been banned in Japan and some European countries. I've scoured the internet but cannot find any reliable source to confirm this (perhaps because I'm only searching in English?). I've only found a couple sources that say it is approved in the EU.

So, I'm going to delete the statement that TBHQ is banned. The only cited source on the page now seems to be a relatively unreliable diet magazine that is now a dead link.

If anyone finds good evidence of a ban, feel free to un-delete the statement and expand on it if possible. Please reply to me as well since I'm curious where such evidence would be found. 35drake (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]