Talk:Terry Fox Run

Canada: Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

UCC being largest Terry Fox Run site?

I took out the part about UCC claiming to have the largest Terry Fox Run and raising the most money; the footnote points back to UCC's own newsletter, which could be considered a breach of NOR.

Seraphchoir 13:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I've deleted it again. The link doesn't work and I can find no secondary source to back up that claim. Either way, it's obviously a promotional reference for the school and sounds highly dubious. Dantès (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On this page it says that he didn't accept cooperate sponsors. In the marathon of hope page, it says "In order to get the Canadian Cancer Society to support him he had to get corporate sponsorship for the run."

I don't think there's anything wrong with that; The Canadian Cancer Society is devoted initiatives to help treat, prevent, and spread awareness of cancer. It's made up of largely volunteers anyway, which would hardly qualify it as a corporation. -- Seraphchoir 13:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

links

The department of defence link does not work any more so I have removed it. Tahnok (talk) 06:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does this work?

The article leaves me confused. Usually the deal with "charity run" events is that some corporate sponsor promises money to the charity in proportion to the number of completing participants, in exchange for the brand recognition that results. The article explicitly states that there are no corporate sponsors involved here. Somewhere one the official website I found an assertion that participants are not charged an entry fee. So where do the money actually come from? How does running about cause funds to be raised if the runners pay nothing and there are no sponsors either? Is there a paying audience? –Henning Makholm (talk) 15:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Run participants solicit donations to the Terry Fox Foundation from friends, family members, co-workers, neighbors etc. before the run. Run participants can also choose to donate to the foundation themselves (in 1980 Terry Fox requested a voluntary $1 entry fee from runners, but that no one be turned away because they lacked an entry fee. More specific information here http://www.terryfox.org/Run/Run_Participants.html --24.142.36.234 (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thailand

I ran in the Terry Fox Run in Bangkok in 1999 or 2000 (I don't remember which). 2002 could not have been the first year... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.112.38.5 (talk) 07:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct, the first race was held in 1995. Fixed. GregorB (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting edit from 2 October 2013‎

It looks like a large portion of the article was (accidentally?) deleted on 2 October 2013‎ without an edit summary. What was left was incomplete and didn't make grammatical sense in places. So I manually reverted to the previous version, and then re-added the information and edits that have been added since then. I also went through and reformatted the references, and updated or replaced the references with dead links where I could. --24.142.36.234 (talk) 20:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Terry Fox Run. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]