Talk:Terrorist Screening Database

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: FBI Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject FBI (assessed as Mid-importance).

How is it Used?

There is nothing in this article to say how the database is used. From reading the article it sounds like terrorist's names are compiled for no reason. I would imagine the database is checked from national ports to check on the where-abouts of the terrorists. Please confirm. NinjaKid 09:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're All Terrorists! Watch List Makes 20k 'Matches' in '06 Ryan Singel Wired Magazine. http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2007/07/watchlists

The primary purpose of the watchlist (like the primary purpose of most of today's surveillance of ordinary citizens), seems to be to hamper anyone who criticizes the administration.

Criteria for inclusion

This Techdirt post and its sources may be of some use: US Has A 'Secret Exception' To Reasonable Suspicion For Putting People On The No Fly List. The main things to extract are:

The TSDB has a "reasonable suspicion" criteria for inclusion.
The TSDB has a secret exception to this criteria.

Have fun. —mjb (talk) 16:59, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Terrorist Screening Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add a reference ?

This document of the OIG might be added: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/FBI/a0925/final.pdf. --Japarthur (talk) 08:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antifa

You are invited to participate in Talk:Antifa (United States)#RfC: antifa and terrorism, a discussion about whether to include that activities by American anti-fascists were labeled as domestic terrorism by the Trump administration. R2 (bleep) 22:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]