Talk:Terri Schiavo case/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Juanm (talk • contribs • count) 10:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
There are some sentence too short. ~~Some instances of "Bush" are without the proper title, leading to potential confusion between governor and president.~~ /(fixed at 2011-9-27)

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
One of the unsourced statements mentioned below is in the lead section
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
there are two notes without the proper cite web template.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Quotes need citation, unsorced statement in article lead needs it too (both are tagged with citation needed template). I've tagged two links as linkrot, this other one [1] is for registered users only and so it needs substitution / link removal

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
I don't see a significative bias in the article at the moment
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Last edit war at the beginning of August 2011 about pronounciation, apparently solved.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Missing caption in infobox image.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
On hold. Please note that unsourced statements might lead the article to fail even the first B-class parameter --Juanm (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Term expired. I see some improvements but the major issues (unsourced statements) are still there. Upgraded as fail, confirmed the current rating --Juanm (talk) 06:16, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]