Jump to content

Talk:Terrence Cody

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTerrence Cody has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 11, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Terrence Cody/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: –Grondemar 03:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Will aim to complete this review in the next couple of days. –Grondemar 03:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some early comments—I'm still in process of reviewing the article:

  • You might want to better center the infobox picture of Cody; he's a bit shifted to the left.
    Note this is minor and won't hold up GA status. –Grondemar 04:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The WP:LEAD needs expansion to cover the full article, perhaps to two paragraphs. A third can be added when Cody gets sufficient NFL experience.
  • I added [citation needed] tags where I thought a citation was needed. Please address.
  • The "Alabama" section is somewhat dense. Would it make sense to create "2008" and "2009" subheadings?

Thanks. –Grondemar 21:33, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed my review; in addition to the above, while I copyedited the article, I think the prose needs work. Parts of the article repeat between sections, such as the Mike Mayock quote on the Senior Bowl, and many other parts just don't flow well. Please review and attempt to improve. Also, while it certainly isn't a requirement, you might want to look into list-defined references: I have found using them makes it far easier to copyedit the prose.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Could you please give me an example from the article? --bender235 (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article will be on hold for seven days waiting for improvements.

Thanks. –Grondemar 04:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait a little longer than 7 days. I'll take care of this article next week. --bender235 (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, no rush. Thanks for letting me know. –Grondemar 14:40, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-revied the revised article, made a couple of copyedited, and decided that it now meets the GA criteria. Therefore, I am passing this article's GAN. Great work! –Grondemar 03:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Terrence Cody. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There is uncited text in the article, particularily the recently added information.
  • The lead does not mention any of this person's legal issues.
  • There is no information post-2016. Is there any recent events that need to be added to this article?

Is anyone willing to address the above, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Terrence_Cody&oldid=1253760726"