Talk:Terrace mutiny

A fact from Terrace mutiny appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 January 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Terrace Mutiny of 1944 was the most serious disciplinary breach in Canadian military history?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/January.

Wikipedia

Canada: British Columbia Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.

Military history: Canadian / North America

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force

Comments

I saw this article on DYK and was interested as I had not previously known of this incident. To be complete, the article could use an "aftermath" section - were the leaders of the mutiny court-martialed, or just sent back to the ranks. Did the division in fact wind up overseas? Thanks. Newyorkbrad 13:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Consequences of the Terrace Mutiny

I agree with Newyorkbrad regarding increasing this article's interest and impact by including a Consequences section. However, it would also make the article more relevant to have it extend to a coverage of the contemporary impact on the local civilians and then bring it forward to any current, carry-over results - i.e.: is there still a town there, is there still a military presence there, are there any civil or military policies in place that can be traced to the event?

Thanks, Ontariorick 13:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is still a town there (the article on Terrace, British Columbia is linked in this article). As for the aftermath, much of what you are asking about can be found in the Daniel German article that is one of the sources of the article. I also seem to recall that Mackenzie King's diary (which is available in archives or large libraries) has entries on this event. The event was pretty well buried at the time, so it is not a well known incident. At the time, Terrace was very remote, and communication and transportation certainly aren't what they are today, which made covering it up all that easier. Things may have changed, but I know a very long time ago the UBC library had very little material on the subject. Agent 86 17:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article should include more information on the background of the mutineers. Were they Quebecois, or just French Canadians from outside Quebec? In the Canadian context this can be an important distinction. Also, who are the Prince Albert Volunteers that are mentioned in the article? Presumably they are not the same as the 1885 Northwest Rebellion article that is linked to here. If they are, I have no knowledge that the unit survived that conflict and would like to see the source for this claim. If it is a seperate unit from Prince Albert, Saskatchewan organized for World War 2 service could someone please make this clear? (also please do not delete these questions again whoever did so)

- Wyldkat June 24, 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.240.109 (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]