Talk:Teri Weigel

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crossover actress?

Okay, so Teri Weigel did THE DECLINE OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION, PART II, in 1988, which sounds like a non-erotic film, as do some of the others in '89 and '90. Now, more specifically, she did non-erotic films after she starting doing X-rated? If so, that would show increasing acceptance of sex in society (and specifically of female sexuality, which we have all kinds of problems accepting in modern society, even now).

The other part, and it's both kind of funny and kind of sad, is that driving is more dangerous than sex! FriendlyRiverOtter 04:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Second Playmate To Do Porn?

According to Susan Kiger's Wiki entry she acted in some B-films, but there's nothing listed in her filmography that is pornographic. I don't think it is accurate to say that Weigel is the second Playmate to do so. Lonewuf (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's because Wiki is incomplete. Her one porn movie, Deadly Love, is listed at iafd.com, and was from 1976, before she was a PMOTM. It was also distributed with the title Hot Nasties. Billdav (talk) 23:07, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen Deadly Love & remain unconvinced that Susan Kiger did any XXX acting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.242.42 (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have not seen the film, but IAFD entry tells she had blowjob in that movie. Is that considered XXX? 109.240.100.113 (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard she's related to David Weigel who writes for Reason.

Could he be her son? Needs a citation I guess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.222.192.193 (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category link

Teri Weigel, based on information presented in the article, is not and never was a courtesan or a prostitute. The closest any given information comes to to that is specifying that she worked in a brothel as a featured performer, which does not imply that she serviced customers. She was a pornographic actress, and in that sense had sex for money, but this is not commonly considered the same as prostitution. I would be perfectly prepared to believe that she had at some point engaged in outright prostitution, but I'd need to see documented evidence first. Given the stigma placed on prostitutes, I think it's unacceptable (under WP:BLP) to categorise her as one without such a citation. --7Kim (talk) 19:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As on her own sites and numerous places on the web attest - she has invited persons to pay for sex with her. There are attestations from the customers and links to reviews of these the encounters. 68.152.95.130 (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do [1] and [2] count? Hondo77 (talk) 20:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC)\[reply]

These references didn't exist in the article when I raised my objection. Now that they do, I'm satisfied. --7Kim (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Material removed

I have removed material from this article that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.

Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott MacDonald (talk) 21:00, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is her own official website a good enough source? Tabercil (talk) 02:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Body

She obviousley is no longer a b cup and I highly doubt she is 108lbs. Should the infobox information have a note that these are from her Playboy shoot in '86?

Remarried now under family name Weigel-Hoffart

https://www.facebook.com/Teri-Weigel-Hoffart-1445584202146085/?hc_ref=ARRqg-sRJ6x8r7zMl556E4nKIpZysfzwg3fPP28cuelZ7Yz0w6fSgQeepXGOP5yfZCo&__xts__[0]=68.ARCoQa0Al1CDRy22IcfFjuPWW6M284Z8Ot8eiN5ET5rQdPbC6_Z63FSjIWp0xi9zsaxoTFYw-R7yKwuyfQ89eFYDRLV9hNy-Y-X_x5vjXxdQM8EYw6kSEP0USQxZ4X-voM-aTsDh9-RH4S1ToHPsbq643SaJ3COnn3iWuF9eRBqcC5l2kMMW48JWAomqI77qQO2S9xuOsi52ff1yH0XL-fS5tix5dCDIhENUd-5Vb02tLv22CHJoqEcxrJKzI4z3quLmoCbW9oda_kY&__tn__=kC-R — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:DF10:4000:E0F6:DD82:FEDD:1CE2 (talk) 15:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate

The infobox gives "1961/1962", but why?
And why the Playboy datasheet is not considered a (reliable?) source? It has February 24, 1962. As does IAFD, and many more places. 86.115.97.143 (talk) 10:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What Playboy datasheet is that? IAFD is not a reliable source. See WP:SPS. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"What Playboy datasheet is that?" Duh? Her playmate datasheet from April 1986 Playboy. 109.240.100.113 (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If that's the only RS then we should just list the year of birth, especially for a borderline notable individual. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]