This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spectroscopy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SpectroscopyWikipedia:WikiProject SpectroscopyTemplate:WikiProject SpectroscopySpectroscopy articles
As my article contains more details and topics on THz spectroscopy, I recommend to leave it or merge the existing article to mine. Time-domain spectroscopy is just a subtopic. Boettge.biz 17:22, 22 May 2013 (CEST)
Yes, I agree, this article is more detailed. There is no reason such details could not be added to the main article without requiring a second article. By creating a separate article, the author implies that time-domain spectroscopy is only one variant of terahertz spectroscopy, yet provides no details on any other type of spectroscopy (frequency-domain, one might presume, as a start).
I agree as well. This article should be the one kept. The other one should be merged into this one as a subtopic. I think, linking to the existing time domain spectroscopy article (as it is done here) is the best solution. DaPhil (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As long as this article continues to expand to include other types of THz spectrosocopies, this is a good top article on THz spectroscopy. TDTS is indeed only one of several ways to perform THz spectroscopy; others include far-IR FTIR, high-frequency microwave devices, free electron lasers, coherent synchrotron radiation, and others. See, for example, chapters 8-11 of this: http://science.energy.gov/~/media/bes/pdf/reports/files/thz_rpt.pdf Linking from here to the Time-Domain article makes sense to me. -Mike, THzNetwork.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.243.88.208 (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
