This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I can see why you would think that, because the numbering of constitutional amendments is a bit of a mess. Originally, this was the fourth constitutional amendment bill to be introduced in the year 2002, so it was referred to as the "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Fourth Amendment Bill of 2002". (In the Hansard referred to you will see it deals with the third and the fourth amendment bills. The third bill became the Eleventh Amendment and the fourth bill became the Tenth Amendment.)
When passed it was the first constitutional amendment to be passed in the year 2003, so it was named the "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Amendment Act, 2003". The numbering as the tenth amendment was only given to it by the Citation of Constitutional Laws Act, 2005. - htonl (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]