Talk:Tenbury Wells

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is the youth café really notable enough for inclusion? I'd say no, but will listen to arguments against. Loganberry (Talk) 12:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

In connection with my expansions to articles on places within the Malvern Hills District, I have attempted a clean up of this article (see history). Comments are welcome on my talk page.

Links and References

Contributors who include volatile links may wish to check from time to time to see if they are still valid (blogs may not be reliable encyclopedic sources).

Links to external photos should include at least a mention Photo, otherwise nobody knows what the link is for and it confuses with the numbered reference section.

Tenbury Wells and the Teme Valley ISBN-13: 978-0752407227 Howard Miller (2004)

When including books as sources, please provide the full information according to Wiki rules, i.e. Author's name, and the date of publication, and if available, the ISBN. This will avoid other contributors having having to clean up. Kudpung (talk) 02:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Six weeks later still nobody has offered any improvements. I've tagged some areas for attention, especially a couple of unintentional weasel words.--Kudpung (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eight months later still no improvements. Photo links deletd. Photos from Geograph should be downloaded to your own computer then uploaded to Wikipedia or Wikimedia - Geograph provides a ready made script for citation and copyright info.--Kudpung (talk) 08:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tenbury in Poetry

Is there an author for this verse? It may be by a writer who may or may not have their own wikipedia biography article.Cloptonson (talk) 06:02, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tenbury Wells. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]