Talk:Tenali Ramakrishna (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Give me a week or two, thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Dr. Blofeld, you've been given more than a month. You still up to this? --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I'd completely forgotten Kailash29792 Promise I'll look at it on the weekend.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Oops, tomorrow morning for sure now!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Cast and crew

• "Initially disinterested, Bhanumathi accepted the offer because of Ranga's association as a cinematographer for films produced by her production company Bharani Pictures." -not sure why that would a reason? I've tweaked it a bit, looks good!

Sources didn't mention anything substantial about her actual disappointment, doc. May be she took up this role as an obligation or as a friendly gesture?

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: A sound article.

Thanks for conducting the review Dr. Blofeld. A special note of thanks to Kailash29792 for extending his help at crucial junctures. Veera Narayana 05:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)