Talk:Ten Thousand Buddhas Monastery/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look and jot notes below - I will make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 06:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~...who moved to Hong Kong almost two decades before in 1933 ....~~ ~~from where?~~

Added "… from mainland China …". —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(as detailed in the subsequent Architecture section). - you don't need this. Also needs a ref

Fixed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~in a brochure~~ ~~- redundant. I'd remove it.~~

Removed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:05, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~as having "undermined" the building's historic "authenticity". - there will be words that can be used for "undermined" and...what is "authenticity" supposed to mean anyway. Style?~~

Changed to "compromised". I think authenticity here refers to its original vibe/atmosphere, which will inevitably be lost whenever an extensive renovation takes place. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Although the temple was "partly reopened" a few months after the mudslide~~ ~~- can be dequoted using different words~~

Changed. —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Casliber: Thanks for the review! I've addressed all the comments you've made so far. I also added some more info about the Monastery's history with my last edit to the article. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:

Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:

(NB: Earwigs copyvio detector was negative/clear

Citations to reliable sources, where required:

No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:

Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

- the only issue here is about gallery use. I'm not normally keen on them, but this is a visually diverse place, and do feel that on the balance of things this adds to the article.

Overall:

Pass or Fail:

pass. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]