Talk:Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ten Principles for the Establishment of a Monolithic Ideological System article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

Error?

Doesn't this article have to be incorrect? It says in the introductory material that the most recent revision to the Principles removed every reference to "communism", but Principle #7 as shown contains the word "communist", which most definitely is a reference to "communism". 2600:1004:B119:2EB:7C95:713:4F0C:2C62 (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Principles listed are the original Principles, which the article states at the beginning of that section. Coinmanj (talk) 04:34, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Coinmanj (talk), then we should also publish a translation of the latest Ten Principles because (except for the Constitution) North Korean documents posted on Wikipedia tend to be outdated and that's to be fixed. 190.219.180.69 (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please add Hangul and Korea language link

Please add the Hangul for "Ten Principles of the One-Ideology System", either to the info-box or within the main text of the article.

There is no "other languages" link to a Korean language version of this article, so that link should be added if it exists (it would be quite odd if it didn't).

Also, I have been told be a Chinese acquaintance, that the principles now do not directly say KIM IL SUNG or KIM JONG IL, but instead that has been replaced with "백두산혈통" (白头山血统 in Chinese), meaing the male line of the BaekDuSan family. BaekDuSan being the mountain where, according to north Korean mythology, KIM IL SUNG based a guerrilla campaign against the Japanese occupation and where KIM JONG IL was born. If this can be verified, it should be noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.51.185.103 (talk) 17:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Tone

Is anyone else going to point out the biased tone of the article? And of all the DPRK-related articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.184.206 (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey 68.193.184.206, you're right about that, we need to correct this article and delete biased anti-North Korean lies. 190.219.180.69 (talk) 13:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Primary source

Can someone provide a link to the primary source of this document? I can't find it, and as the article says it's a fundamental document for the DPRK's politics, it's very odd that the sources all seem to be either from foreign organizations or known Washington backed propaganda operations (such as Radio Free Asia) 177.40.134.133 (talk) 21:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs of the 2013 revision may be seen here. I don't have a translation of the text at hand but from memory it's about what one would expect: "we must treasure the life we have been given by the great men of paektu blah blah blah." This is not CIA/NIS fakery. It's very real and like evolution in biology no aspect of North Korean politics is explainable in its absence. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 23:14, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]