Talk:Ten O'Clock Classics

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 August 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.tocmusic.com/about.html. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006111410009853.
This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission.

Untitled

Dear Wiki Community:

I hold the copyright to the text in question for Ten O'Clock Classics, and I am permitting use of this text in Wikipedia. I will email a text to the foundation to this effect.

Thank you for your time and consideration, Ronen Segev, Ten O'Clock Classics

Please read Wikipedia:Copyrights for information on how you can license your material to Wikipedia. -- Donald Albury 00:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

Please do not post, revert, or otherwise add to this article any material regarding one of this musical group's members' unfortunate experience trying to lodge a complaint against a well known travel website. If you would like to know why, take a look at the WP:RFP report here. Doing so after being warned to stop may result in temporary blocking to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia and/or temporary protection of this article to prevent edits. Thanks, Wikidemon (talk) 02:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page Held Hostage

As seen above, this page has been largely written by a biased source, Ronen Segev of Ten O'Clock Classics. The neutrality of this page must STRONGLY be called into question when it is, in effect, merely a billboard for his organization.

Further, Wiki editors have wrongly protected Segev and this page, incorrectly citing BLP rules. In fact, the rules state, "Many Wikipedia articles contain material on people who are not well known, even if they are notable enough for their own article. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to the person's notability." Segev is most notable for his clash with Priceline.com. It is what brought him to national attention in the first place. It made newspapers across the country, was all over the web, and received plenty of commentary. Sources are abundant. By any imaginable standard, this incident is CLEARLY relevant to his notability. The fact that he is a squeaky wheel about it should have no relevance, but since he has been allowed to write his own page - again, making it essentially an advertisement rather than an unbiased page - editors like Wikidemon are ever vigilant.

And wrongly so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.195.114.49 (talk) 15:48, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page survived a deletion nomination. The consensus of editors is that the organization is independently notable. The decision that this material is inappropriate on WP:BLP grounds is mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive147#Ten O'Clock Classics and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive60#Ten O'Clock Classics, and the matter apparently got Jimbo Wales' attention as well as some site administrators. I've cautioned you about this on your talk page, and will go ahead and revert again on BLP grounds. You seem to have made a hobby of this page, so perhaps you are the same editor who's been pushing this point for years? If you are here in good faith to edit Wikipedia and not just to disparage this particular individual, please take a look at some editing rules like WP:BLP, WP:AGF, WP:CONSENSUS, and WP:EW, and spend your time making meaningful improvements to the content here instead of getting involved in silly fights and accusations over article content. I'll go ahead and revert on BLP grounds. You're welcome to discuss here or on some notice board, but as a last caution, do not try to edit war this content back in. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 16:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reputation.com

What about his use of Reputation.com to edit his own article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.48.192 (talk) 17:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]