Talk:Tempus Fugit (The X-Files)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Intro: It says "'Zero Sum' helped to…" I assume this was just a typo.
- I'm a terrible copy-paster. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Infobox: I would add a cite for the cast
- Added.
- Production: What exactly is "verisimilitude"? Maybe wikilink it or explain it
- Realism, or the nature of being realistic; I could point it to verisimilitude or wikt:verisimilitude if you want, not sure which would be best for the casual reader; could also just reword it too if you think something else works best. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Production: "Director Rob Bowman has admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…" I would remove the 'has' to say: "Director Rob Bowman admitted that the episode exceeded its given budget, noting…"
- Gone. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Reception: Maybe add "'Tempus Fugit' received mixed to positive reviews from critics."
- Added. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Reception: Should "A-" use an en-dash? Like "A–"? I'm not really sure, but I think so.
- MOS:MATHS uses "−" for minus, which is halfway between those two in size. I'll start using that from now on and try to roll it out on any past articles where I've used a hyphen-minus. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Those hyphens and dashes drive me crazy.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- MOS:MATHS uses "−" for minus, which is halfway between those two in size. I'll start using that from now on and try to roll it out on any past articles where I've used a hyphen-minus. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Those are the only things I can find. Solid article. On hold.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ridiculously prompt review. I've got everything so far except "verisimilitude", let me know which of the above options works best for you. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I submitted a few last night and saw this, so I decided to review it. Everything looks great; frankly I like the word verisimilitude, so I'd keep it and just link it to the Wiki page, that works for me.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Fair do. I've linked to the wiki article for it then. GRAPPLE X 14:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Awesome, it's a pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Fair do. I've linked to the wiki article for it then. GRAPPLE X 14:27, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. I submitted a few last night and saw this, so I decided to review it. Everything looks great; frankly I like the word verisimilitude, so I'd keep it and just link it to the Wiki page, that works for me.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ridiculously prompt review. I've got everything so far except "verisimilitude", let me know which of the above options works best for you. GRAPPLE X 03:47, 3 May 2012 (UTC)