Talk:Temporary Assistance for Needy Families

Social Work High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Salemus1993.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations to the US Code

I don't know how to edit wiki pages, but when I was researching I wished that this page had provided the relevant sections of the US Code and/or CFR so I could find it easily. I believe a valid citation would be: 42 U.S.C. §601-619.

Also, when I was researching it, the TANF home page was very useful, found here: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/tanf/index.html. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.67.110.214 (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amounts

Article should mention how much is paid per month typically to recipients. Tempshill 05:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak nationally, but in Washington state the average payment per case is about $430/month. Also, TANF has been reauthorized under the Defecit Reduction Act.

This is good

New Jersey TANF payment schedule [as per NJ Adminsitrative Code: 10:90-3.3(b)]

Family Size Payment

--Wow, what an embarrassment of riches. Clearly these people are living high on the hog. </sarcasm> --Danaseilhan (talk) 08:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correlations

You may want to cite this 2003 article claiming that reduction in TANF rolls have not always correlated to decreases in poverty or unemployment: http://www.cbpp.org/9-4-03tanf.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.229.92 (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a table showing the annual poverty rate vs: number of TANF recipients, if someone would care to extend the table to include annual unemployment rates that would be interesting. Regards, Chuckiesdad (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Flagging that the reference (http://cqresearcherblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/are-safety-nets-working.html Are "Safety Nets" Working. CQ Researcher Blog) supporting the statement "There is a maximum of 60 months of benefits within one's lifetime, but some states have instituted shorter periods." does not make reference to either point it purports to support. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.110 (talk) 00:54, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link to http://www.acf.hhs.gov/news/facts/tanf.html pointed to a file not found page. If anyone know where this file is they should fix the link. Ender8282 (talk) 19:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This link has already been fixed. Chuckiesdad (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its time to re-evaluate work and look again at the philosophy of the guaranteed anual income that led to Welfare in this country. Having people work at places like Carls Jr. is counter productive, it is much better to pay them to stay home or pay them for being healthy or pursuing education or liesure. Its time to pop the delusion of most Americans that they are productive, they have been displaced by automation which is also their inheritance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.112.142.83 (talk) 02:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The link for citation 16 for: Rowe, Gretchen (2000), "State TANF Policies as of July 1999" (PDF), Welfare Rules Database does not work. This link needs to be revised. Salemus1993 (talk) 01:52, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

modifications to the page

Hi everyone, I've been working on editing this page as part of an assignment for a class but the content is in my sandbox. In the next few weeks, I will gradually move content from my sandbox to this page. Ylor916 (talk) 07:09, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed this article from Wikidata

The old Wikidata for this article is about a government program in Japan. This article is now removed form there.Kovl (talk) 08:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Background section is severely lacking

As is, the background section details a broad political debate over welfare. I think the background should include a description of previous welfare programs and what led to the implementation of this particular version of welfare. As is, the reader will get bogged down in the political debate and not be able to simply understand what this form of welfare is compared to previous ones. The political debate stuff should have a section of its own, maybe called: controversy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.161.138 (talk) 04:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Background

"Conservatives argued that such programs were ineffective, promoted dependency on the government, and encouraged behaviors detrimental to escaping from poverty." Which such programs? This was the FIRST sentence in its section. --Khajidha (talk) 17:38, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now it's even worse. It just says "some" argued, which is even weaselier than "conservatives" Charlotte Aryanne (talk) 15:34, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Clinton signed the bill into law on August 22, 1996. PRWORA replaced AFDC with TANF and dramatically changed the way the federal government and states determine eligibility and provide aid for needy families." There is not citation as well as an explanation on how the passing of the bill "dramatically changed" the determination of individuals qualifying this type of governmental assistance. Salemus1993 (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Impact Section Missing Citations

The last paragraph on this section is missing citation. The statement "As such, other factors have been taken into account in assessing the impact of TANF: work, earnings, and poverty of former welfare recipients; marriage and fertility of mothers; well being of mothers; and child well being" should be cited since it is listing factors of measurement (the impact of TANF in this case).Salemus1993 (talk) 01:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Section Addition on Post TANF Membership

This new section would focus on TANF exits and how they differ across people groups within two specific geographic locations (metro areas and non metro areas/rural areas). Construction under way. 22:54, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Salemus1993 (talk) 22:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal Well-Being doesn't discuss how studies are conducted

The section on Maternal Well-Being asserts that mothers who leave TANF and start working experience better mental capacity, less depression, and overall better mental health. It asserts this happens as a result of working; I'd like more detail: what studies tracked the state of mental health before and after exiting TANF, and did they show that exiting TANF causes increased mental health or that those with better mental health are more-able to exit TANF? —John Moser (talk) 21:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Table Needs Updating

The table covers the trends from 1996-2010, but nothing after that. At this point it is extremely out of date. Deepfryer99 (talk) 12:40, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]