Talk:Temporal resolution

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This reference http://webvision.med.utah.edu/temporal.html can be used when expanding the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.122.121.177 (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Brief History of Time

What teaser? Certainly Newton expected gravity to propogate at infinite velocity, indeed the term 'propogation' is meaningless in the Newtonian context. But how is that relevant today? I've just re-read Brief History and can find nothing to support this statement. Bluntly, I think this whole paragraph is nonsense. Pawprintoz (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it reads as nonsense to me as well. I have read the Brief History of Time and I don't recall anything like this from its pages. I don't have a copy to check from, but if someone wants to put this back, please add a full citation with edition and page numbers. jni ^(delete)_{just not interested} 19:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is dreadful. For one thing much of it confuses resolution with sampling interval. The part about the speed of light and a trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution seems plain wrong to me; in the classical regime you can compensate for delay and in the quantum regime the trade-off is between energy and temporal resolution. The only thing that's correct is the basic definition of the term. 94.195.197.112 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Temporal resolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120605152114/http://aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/ara/arc/cp/0747.pdf to http://aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/ara/arc/cp/0747.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]