Talk:Temporal (Duration)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Temporal (Duration) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 1 June 2013 by reviewer AppleJack-7 (talk · contribs).

Extended version

A more complete treatment can be found at Temporal (duration)—original version --Espresso-con-pana (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incoherent

This article, in its present form, is quite incoherent. Its first paragraph is a bloated dictionary definition of the word "temporal"; the second discusses an alternative meaning of "temporal", as a rough synonym of "eartly" or "secular"; while the third just seems to be an enumeration of random concepts (spacetime, cyclical history, angst) and expressions that can be associated with time. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've turned the article into a redirect to temporal. I believe no information is last, as we already have articles about time, philosophy of space and time and various other topics that were addressed here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 13:05, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]