Talk:Temple Beth Sholom (Cherry Hill, New Jersey)

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 21 June 2011, see discussion.
inconclusive; the article was speedy-deleted for copyright violations., 16 June 2011, see discussion.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because a notable synagogue in an affluent Jewish area. --Tinton5 (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please document the notability through reliable source coverage? I haven't been able to find any. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to. I would like others to help as well. NOthing personal, its just these pages have been up for months and were never marked for deletion. I will try to find sources. Tinton5 (talk) 21:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update

As a creator of this page, I am currently refraining from adding any info/expanding until a consensus is reached from other editors. Tinton5 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to prevent the page from being deleted, the best way to do so would be to add reliably sourced content to the article that establishes the topic's notability per WP:GNG and WP:ORG (if appropriate sources exist).
If a Wikipedia policy or guideline has led you to think that you are required to sit in silence when an article you created is being discussed at WP:AFD, please tell us what gave you that misconception, so the real situation can be clarified. (There is no such policy.) --Orlady (talk) 03:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Would you be willing to help contribute? Tinton5 (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who created the article. I'm not Jewish, I've newer been to Cherry Hill, and I've not seen or found any evidence that the topic is notable, so I'm not exactly enthusiastic about building the article. However, I'm happy to provide assistance if you have some good content that you need help with. --Orlady (talk) 04:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tinton -- Orlady was completely correct here. You should not hesitate to ever improve an article, as she indicated, because you created it. Just the opposite .. as one with interest in it, you should feel encouraged to improve it. (though here, with 10 Keep !votes currently at the AfD, and zero Delete !votes, the article will no doubt be kept soon enough).--Epeefleche (talk) 23:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]