Talk:Temperley transporter

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

History

The British Royal Navy, the French Navy, and the U.S. Navy all experimented with the Temperley transporter during the 1890s in their efforst to find a reliable method to recoal their warships at sea. See Spencer Miller, "Coaling Warships at Sea" Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, vol. 7 (189): 1-18. Lbart73 (talk) 16:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, year of publication should read 1899. Miller's article mentions the transporter but gives few details of its operations. It seems to have been one of the more successful ideas tried, although no truly effective method of coaling at sea was ever found. Lbart73 (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I see no reason for the notability template. I searched for the word and found the article, which gives at least a minimum of information. --Årvasbåo (talk) 16:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]