Talk:Telus World of Science Edmonton

Canada: Alberta / Education Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

Museums Mid‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Myceliumrails (talk · contribs)

music machine

should there be any mention about the musical machine in front of the front doors of the twos? it is (in my opinion) a rather important or atleast eye catching feature of the building

Rename

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. Consensus is in favor of parenthetical disambiguation here, and the supporters appear to have policy at their side. Ucucha 04:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Telus World of Science, Edmonton → Telus World of Science (Edmonton) — To match Telus per acronyms policy, and because the comma convention only applies to "city, province" constructions. For buildings we usually use parentheses. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 22:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support the lowercase, oppose the parentheses - geographic dabbing is done by comma. The building is not "an Edmonton". 81.111.114.131 (talk) 01:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it should be parentheses:

Telus World of Science is not a settlement
There are multiple Telus World of Sciences across Canada, one I know is in Calgary. Edmonton needs to be there so it disambiguates these Telus World of Sciences.174.3.98.236 (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how "it's not a settlement" is anything to do with it. This is geographical disabiguation (i.e. distinguishing it by where rather that what it is), so it should have a comma. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support174.3.98.236 (talk) 19:20, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Move requests are also in place for the Vancouver and Calgary locations, ~~as well as the the article lead: TELUS World of Science~~. Given multiple locations I believe parentheses disambiguation is appropriate.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Support move to Telus World of Science, Edmonton. Geographical disambiguation should be by comma, not parentheses. The argument above is not whether Edmonton should be there, but whether it should be ...Science, Edmonton or ...Science (Edmonton). Skinsmoke (talk) 05:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding was that comma disambiguation is used when I higher district is involved or when dealing with cities, towns, villages and other settlements themselves (WP:NCGN), not simply as a general rule (ex: The Union Stations).--Labattblueboy (talk) 12:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have moved the page to correct the capitalized "TELUS" issue, as that portion of the move is strictly procedural based on the naming guidelines. The preemptive move should not be taken as a comment on the debate between using commas and parentheses; that will be resolved through the consensus reached in this ongoing move discussion. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about this. --Ckatz^chat _spy 23:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support as proposed. The comma disambiguation is for places and not things as stated in WP:NCDAB. All other articles should generally use parenthesis for disambiguation since that is the standard for the wiki. This is not geographic disambiguation as some have suggested above, it is for like named things. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Telus World of Science (Edmonton). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 February 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

result:
No consensus. Closure requested <permalink>. See no agreement below after much time and two relists that the Edmonton TWoS is the primary topic. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments, discover new arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for change. Thanks and kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Editing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 22:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move logs: current title · target title

This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

Result:
No consensus. Closure requested <permalink>. See no agreement below after much time and two relists that the Edmonton TWoS is the primary topic. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments, discover new arguments and try again in a few months to garner consensus for change. Thanks and kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Editing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 22:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

– This is the only venue currently named "Telus World of Science", and the one most closely associated with the name. The existing disambiguation page can easily redirect those looking for the venues in Calgary or Vancouver. 162 etc. (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:59, 13 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 15:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No evidence that the Edmonton venue is the primary topic. Perhaps relist to give a chance to provide such? Andrewa (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: The Calgary Science Centre opened in 1987, and was only known as Telus World of Science from 2005 until its closure in 2011. The venue in Vancouver was for a time known as "Science World at the Telus World of Science", so that one is actually a PTM. The venue in Edmonton has used the name "Telus World of Science", both officially and commonly, for almost 20 years now. 162 etc. (talk) 20:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But to further clarify, that doesn't seem to have any relevance in terms of out article naming policy. Andrewa (talk) 05:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Museums has been notified of this discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 15:20, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Reliable sources since the expiration of the Vancouver naming rights largely follow the name change. WP:NAMECHANGES: "If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match." Dohn joe (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Good points, and WP:NAMECHANGES is certainly relevant. But this isn't just about the naming of the other two candidates for the name Telus World of Science, one of which is of course the one at Vancouver. Rather it is about whether the one at Edmonton is now the primary topic, or whether it still requires disambiguation to distinguish it from the other two. I don't think we have yet established PT, so no change of !vote. Andrewa (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.