Talk:Television ratings in Australia

Television ratings in Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Top-importance).

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Article work

This article is in need of urgent attention. There is alot of information that could be ellaborated in this article, however at current it is very stub-like. Stickeylabel 12:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added a framework for the article, however it is still minimal and other sections could be added. Stickeylabel 12:32, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think doing a rename of the article would be a good idea, as the title led me to believe that it was relating to the ratings that are put on telly shows, such as Y, PG, and the like.Scatterbrain —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 19:27, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of DMCA takedown (with which the WMF did not comply)

Please be aware that the Wikimedia Foundation has received a takedown notice for material contained in this article. In this case, the Foundation did not comply with the takedown. Posted for your awareness. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 01:09, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After further communication, the WMF is compelled to comply. Please see WP:Office for more information. I hope that my removal and revision suppression will be sufficient, but may have to take different action if advised by the legal department after the office opens today in San Francisco. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 13:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

it's a shame that the ratings pages since 2001, and the most watched broadcast tables were taken down. A shame they couldn't meet criteria. I take it that its because of copyright laws involving oztam? (im assuming its because of that) Yellow sock (talk) 13:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is their claim, yes. You can read their initial letter to us here: [1]. As Philippe noted above, the WMF did not initially comply but after further communication from them feel they must. --Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 13:23, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just read that initial letter. Makes sense to me now. Thanks Yellow sock (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very saddening to see this occur, as facts in databases aren't really eligible for copyright[2][3], only the way in which databases are displayed is. I believe Wikipedia displayed the facts significantly differently to original OzTAM data tables, so the ratings tables should have been allowed and shouldn't have been removed by WP:Office actions. If I could, I would send a counter-notice but I really don't have the will or effort in doing so, especially with the potential for legal costs. Happily888 (talk) 11:39, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Television ratings in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080312150751/http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu:80/article-pacificislands.asp?parentid=70786 to http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article-pacificislands.asp?parentid=70786

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]