Talk:Telephone numbers in New Zealand

This article is written in New Zealand English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, analyse, centre, fiord) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trunk prefix

Isn't 'trunk' the American term? Should we not use "exchange"?Royalcourtier (talk) 06:51, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Telephone numbers in New Zealand/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It seems that the 029 prefix is allocated to Telstra Clear not Vodafone according to the Telecom site http://www2.telecom.co.nz/pdf/charging&numbering/s5jul02.pdf

124.179.180.146 09:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Mark Spencer - mark.anthony.spencer@gmail.[reply]

Surely the continent is Zealandia as opposed to Oceana which is the region. I'm sure this is a common mistake. Sorry don't have a reference, new to wikipediA.

Last edited at 05:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 07:46, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed area codes section

I've taken the liberty of removing the "proposed area codes" section as it seems impossible in context of the rest of the article. For example there can't be a proposed area code 2 as that prefix is largely accounted for by mobile networks. It could possibly have been a suggestion from some time in the 1980s in which case it may be of slight interest as a 'first draft' but with no source or reference I can't check that. Daveosaurus (talk) 10:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

n 95.5.113.12 (talk) 21:31, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+9647829533394 37.237.254.173 (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]