Talk:Tejon Pass

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elevation of the Pass?

There seems to be some confusion about the elevation of Tejon Pass. This article has its elevation as 4,183 ft. A quick peek at Google Earth suggests that the elevation at road level is 4,160 ft. The official federal GNIS system also lists Tejon Pass at 4,160 ft. Anyone be able to help out here? NorCalHistory (talk) 17:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The change has been made to 4,160 feet. Yours, GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

___

Nevertheless, the sources DO differ, so two figures are now being used. I think the discrepancy might stem from the translation from meters to feet, but who is to say without going out to measure it? GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Lebec 1943.jpg

The image File:Lebec 1943.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:17, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Something is wrong with this sentence . . .

At the same time the first grant of Rancho Los Alamos y Agua Caliente in 1843, included the pass which was called Portezuela de Castac (Castac Pass). Can it be corrected or made more understandable. Maybe with or without the comma, or by some rewording? Thank you! GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No chains

I removed the addition because it is out of date. Comment here if you like. GeorgeLouis (talk) 05:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was probably not a wise move on my part to continue to cite something from 2008. I should have double-checked the CalTrans website, and it does currently list the Tejon Pass as one of the areas where chains may be required. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request Cross-Section Drawing

This article needs a cross-section drawing similar to one that I found in an LA Times article, but need to add miles along the X-axis. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 04:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC) https://web.archive.org/web/20200405035532/https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/6a5fdf9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1564x1051+0+0/resize/840x564!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F39%2F8c%2F40f0d27f4f0798c95c1f78b0c6b5%2Fla-me-wednesday-storm-grapevine-03252020-artboard-4.jpg[reply]