Talk:Tehran Stock Exchange/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Comment

Two redlinks, one external link in here. Perseus (t • c) 17:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer:

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Great article but three things I think need to updated before it deserves to go from on-hold to approved:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Not a huge problem yet, but the article uses "in recent years" fairly frequently yet data references to 2008 and before - while fine for now, for future proofing may be wise to use "in the years 2002 through 2008..." instead

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Missing a reference in the "Mutual Funds" section

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Self created pictures are nice, personally hard to verify data (I can't read Farsi), but would be great if data in them can be improved (ie:USD-IRR_exchange_rate.JPG) shows data only till 2008 - when you should be able to get more recent data.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Very very close, I'm almost tempted to Be Bold with it

Epistemophiliac (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Concerns seem to be addressed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

1. I agree, I think it's a good article now Epistemophiliac (talk) 03:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)