Talk:Teddy Air

Teddy Air has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 23, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 9, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Teddy Air was the first airline to win a public service obligation in Norway?

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Defunct airlines

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Teddy Air/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewing

I will undertake this review. The article appears stable, neutral and generally well written. It covers the subject adequately. The image appears in good order. There are appropriate inline cites. In some paragraphs, fats could be cited more closely, but I accept in good faith that the cites provided support the info in each para (I don't read Norwegian). I have copyedited in places for clarity. This article has no outstanding issues, so I will pas it. hamiltonstone (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]