Jump to content

Talk:Ted Bundy/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I peer reviewed this and feel it is close to FA standards and more than meets the GA criteria. For suggestions for improvement, please see Wikipedia:Peer review/Ted Bundy/archive2. I also note that the dab link finder finds one disambiguation link that needs to be fixed. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 20:05, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Glad to see that a group of editors is working together on improving this article.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Please see the peer review comments on fair use images - I am not sure it would pass FAC with the Utah mug shot and perhaps the fair use photo of one vicitm
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: