Talk:Ted Alford/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"He finished the season as the second most-productive Lions receiver with 721 receiving yards, leading the Lions to nominate Alford for the league-wide Most Outstanding Rookie award." - repetition of the world Lions

"36–35 upset of the Calgary Stampeders" - 36-35 upset over the Calgary Stampeders

"he injured his hamstring and didn't return to the active roster for the rest of the season." - did not

On hold until all the points have been actioned. MWright96 (talk) 19:14, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: I believe everything has been addressed. Note that I reworded the one point under the Stampeders section a bit differently than you suggested, but it still addresses your concern. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 19:30, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your quick response. GA class has been achieved. MWright96 (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]