Talk:Tech noir

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Science Fiction High‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

proposed page move

should it be called future noir the more common name for the genre? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.231.231 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- According to whom? You and the talking juke box? Oversoul (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? I've never heard it called anything other than tech noir.96.253.85.58 (talk) 02:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First sendiri The Talking Juke Box! feb 11, 2022 Keep it at TechNoir. We are further Then 2006 and HoY I Don’t have it. 2022 Guestno.26 (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:StoneSmoking.jpg

The image Image:StoneSmoking.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

File:BladeRunnerSS.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of the Terminator(Film)?

It would be great if this article a few sentences about this movie, seeing how tech-noir was the primary theme of this well known movie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.233.96.160 (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Terminator doesn't seem very noir to me. It is a straight forward psycho-killer action movie with sci-fi elements. There's no detective, no world-weary cynicism, no substance abuse, or any other classic noir elements. Do you have a source for its inclusion? Ashmoo (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is this?

I haven't seen anything in this article to suggest that 'Tech noir' is anything more than a description of the art style of most cyberpunk movies. There's no real citations and the article almost boils down to a list of movies that supposedly fit into the 'tech noir' "genre". Should we merge this into cyberpunk? --68.88.253.102 (talk) 15:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awful

This article is just awful, an embarrassment, really. Is this a genre, or a style of art and set design, or simply a description of a certain "look" or "feel" shared by a certain arbitrary set of films? The article is unclear because it lacks cites from reliable sources. Tech noir exists, certainly, as the phrase was coined for The Terminator, but only to describe a certain style Cameron was going for. Nothing suggests that this is a genre, or even a subgenre. If you go through the article and remove all the speculation and unsubstantiated opinion, there would be very little left. This would be a good idea, actually, and then what remains can be merged to the cyberpunk article, since what is described here is nearly identical. ---RepublicanJacobite_TheFortyFive 17:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion that the world of 1984, in which "The Terminator" takes place, is "Cyberpunk" falls on its face. "Tech Noir" is somewhat a stretch, but more believable than "cyberpunk," since there is only one killer cyborg in the 1984 story. I think a "Cyberpunk" 1984 would involve a more wide-spread and cultural focus on tech than as depicted, which pretty much mirrors the actual 1984 as experienced by movie goers, with the additions of the time-traveling guardian and assassin. Oversoul (talk) 11:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of Tech Noir

I see a lot of great data about tech noir, but no definition of it. Does someone have a definition for Tech Noir they would like to share?

Brobert027 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:27, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This says: "Tech-noir films are about technology perceived as a destructive and dystopian force that threatens every aspect of our reality. They often expose the temporal nature of concepts of identity and society: rather than being fixed aspects of a permanent and indestructible 'nature,' these concepts, like nature itself, are shown as mere parts of a larger simulacrum that is subject to change, exploitation, and even annihilation." Erik (talk | contribs) 00:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CfD for Category:Tech noir

There is a discussion about deleting this category. If you'd like to weigh in, please voice your opinion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 April 28#Category:Tech noir. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:06, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(ties a red band around the arm for differentiation) Yeah I will weigh in. Delete it, and we'll repost it. Even on another domain, if needed. This should be construed as argumentation against deletion, and no others. Oversoul (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gothic Science Fiction

Why is this article under this name instead of Gothic Science Fiction? That name sounds very European and this is an American website so WTF? § — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1000:A102:7B6E:FC2A:7F30:207C:5F41 (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]