Talk:Tebis

I've just removed the prod-deletion template on this article. It was very badly written indeed. Hopefully this will be up to a minimum standard now, and more categorizations can be added. Context for medium-sized and very well established companies is very hard to pin-down. Only when you work in an industry and try to contribute to a wikipedia article do you realize just how flimsy and easily lost corporate history of any kind is. There is a rich and extensive history in CAD/CAM software over decades which explains almost the whole pattern. However too little gets written down, and much of it is secret. For a better article, drawing together some crucial pieces of history, see NC Graphics.Goatchurch (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is indeed now intelligible, and attempts to make some case for notability; though I still question whether any $50k software package is going to ever get the sort of independent coverage needed to meet WP:CORP. I don't see this company handing out many review copies. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]