Talk:Team Hoyt

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Triathlon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Triathlon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Triathlon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TriathlonWikipedia:WikiProject TriathlonTemplate:WikiProject TriathlonTriathlon articles

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Untitled

I redid it and deleted the words "remarkable" and "much sought after", which may have been the problem.

I'll be adding more soon. I've done research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.135.111.64 (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed 2008 tag here. The question of possible copyright violation has become moot, as the questionable content has since been either removed or reworked. Hertz1888 (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should any of this be plagiarized,

Let it go; In the case of the hoyts, no author would feel their coverage is more important than spreading the knowledge about these two men. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.160.135 (talk) 05:19, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately even if the article content isn't plagiarised, it still reads inappropriately for an encyclopedia. Someone with suitable sources (or access to the ones listed in the article, if they're verifiable) should probably run a comb over everything after the lead. 60.241.179.28 (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Needs serious work

This article is a mess. I don't know if it is a copyright violation, but that's almost beside the point. The content is full on POV statements and reads more like a gushing biography than like any kind of encyclopedic article. I did a little cleanup of the opening section but it needs a lot more. --Crunch (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did more cleanup later today. --Crunch (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it was originally written or intended as encyclopedic. It appeared one day full-blown, as if copied from a periodical or book, which would account for the tone. By the time you get through transforming it—which seems to be proceeding nicely—the suspected copy vio. notices will probably be entirely moot, and it should be okay to remove them. Hertz1888 (talk) 02:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed it all. While I wouldn't mind you restoring it, clean it up before restoring it. It doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards at all. Griffinofwales (talk) 20:27, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misses the Point!

This entry is very bland and does not express the real point and focus of why Rick and Dick Hoyt are so popular. They are most known for being so dedicated to each other. And also, why isn't the part about Rick saving Dick's life in here? THUMBS DOWN TO THIS ENTRY. COULD BE MORE ORGANIZED AND HAVE WAY MORE INFO. :(( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.55.87 (talk) 19:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]