Talk:Tea production in Bangladesh
A fact from Tea production in Bangladesh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ajannat108.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Viewpoints Underrepresented and Reliability of the Sources
[edit]Several sections of the article are underrepresented. The section titled "Labour" requires some elaboration. Almost no information is given regarding the topic. The section describes what region many of the laborers come from, but does not elaborate on the topic by explaining the reasons for which many of these laborers have been displaced to the Bangladesh region. It does not express the viewpoint of any laborers. The section titled "Governing Bodies" poses a similar problem, because it mentions the Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, without explaining its features and the way in which it operates. It is likely that there are more governing bodies in place that affect and deal with the tea production in Bangladesh, but there is no mention of anything more. I would suggest revisiting the sources used for these sections to acquire more information, or perhaps seeking additional sources that would contribute to these subtopics.
The article also cites sources that may not be reliable. One of the sources is a document on Scribd.com by an MBA student attending university and thus has not been properly checked for academic integrity or factual correctness. It is a document that has not yet been graded by the Professor of whichever course it was written for, and thus may not be reliable.I would suggest that, if the information from this source is very useful, the original sources for this document be consulted, to eliminate the bias and possible incorrectness of this particular MBA student. This can be done by looking into the document's bibliography and retrieving information directly from these sources.
Louisedeboutte (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2016 (UTC)louisedeboutte