Talk:Taylor series/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tarret talk 16:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Key areas such as the "History section" have citations. In the long-term the paragraph starting "Uses of the Taylor series..." under the section Analytic function and the section called Taylor series as definitions may eventually require a citation as although this may be common knowledge to a person studying the topic, the common person may still benefit from being able to verify these claims should this article eventually be submitted for a WP:FA. (See WP:SCG)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- I will assume that the Mathematics Wikiproject (or an Mathematics expert) can confirm that this article has all the major aspects.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Keep up the good work on this article.
- Pass/Fail: