Talk:Taxonomy of the burden of treatment

Brandon Shin What does the article (or section) do well? Formatting is very solid. Plan is definitely there and the direction of the article seems solid. I like how complex the The formatting is easy to read and has a cohesive flow to the topic discussed. Good graphics to accompany topics, it allows you to back up your points.

What changes would you suggest overall? I think you will change? but some points are first person. Remember to be objective, some sentences were objective ex: sentence can be changed to "Doctors were considered highly knowledgeable...". I think some headings seem a little unclear. Adding pictures would help if there are any to add.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Just making all the points of the article come together to explain the topic.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! Yes. The complexity of the formatting of the article with the headings and subheadings is something my article is lacking. This article has a lot of depth to it which allows the topic to be discussed very thoroughly.

Dover Fiscian What does the article (or section) do well? The lede gives a great introduction to the topic and makes the reader know what to look forward to in the article.

What changes would you suggest overall? Well, to expand the points more because there are some great points, but little details to it.

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? more depth to the points listed.

Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! I love the fact that a lot of research has gone into your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Revod123 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)