Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

• Avoid saying things like "in the current century" as in the lead. Use specific dates, range of years, century, etc.

 Done date inserted --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

• What exactly does "escape" refer to in the lead?

 Done the same as in the text, escape from cultivation and subsequent naturalisation, a technical term in the evolution of speciation. Clarified. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

• Who accepted 160 species? All these other figures talked about with their authors, but not this one.

 Done Adrian Haworth. Attributed now --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

This looks good overall. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)