Talk:Tax treaty

Oldtaxguy (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tax Status

Please add a section discussing the "dual" tax status as it affects millions of people. Thanks, Melissa

I'm assuming you mean dual resident. Dual residency indeed affects many, that's why treaties often have "tie breaker" clauses. Unfortunately, general discussions of these is infeasible. I'm aware of at least 5 different versions, and one treaty with no tie breaker. The article has short mention of tie breakers. I'll give thought to how I might add 1-2 more sentences.

Under U.S. foreign tax credit rules, there's also a "dual status" situation: a taxpayer may be paying a tax that is both an income tax and a fee for services. That's much more complex. Regards, Sfcardwell (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tax treaty/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== WP Tax Class ==

Start class because the article needs expansion into sections on context, impact, history and perhaps examples.EECavazos (talk) 19:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== WP Tax Priority ==

High priority because the article is on a worldwide issue and likely will have high traffic and is the basic article on the issue.EECavazos (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 19:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:41, 30 April 2016 (UTC)