Talk:Tatra 54

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The picture here 30 or Tatra 30/52. The Tatra T54 twodoor has the door's edge at the same hight as the sidestep T54 http://www.tatraportal.com/popisky/t54/t54_09.jpg T30 has it higher http://www.tatraportal.com/popisky/t30/t30_17.jpg

anybody can provide T54 image?

Cimmerian praetor (talk) 21:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the photo in Tatra museum in Kopřivnice last summer and I was wondering the same. The sign in the museum said it is T54. I had to check out my photo files and when I enlarged it I noticed that the edge there is not door bottom edge but just an edge on the door surface. The bottom edge is lower as it should be.

Strange. I don't find a such door in any other T54 photo in Internet. --Gwafton (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you are saying it. When I was translating it for you, I skipped one part as I was thinking that it is not important. It is the initial part about the twodoor and the door - dasher step. "To make it even more confusing, there is an original T54 on display in Tatra museum, which has the step between the door and the dasher." I didn't see that only now when you point it out it is visible that the bottom point is the way it should be. Thanks for telling me Cimmerian praetor (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good that this came out - I'll write about it to the Finnish article. --Gwafton (talk) 23:06, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]