Talk:Tatjana Ostojić

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 September 2023 by reviewer Ortizesp (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Was WP:Reference bombed

This draft is WP:Reference bombed and is dubious when measured against WP:CORP. It takes only WP:THREE sources to convince of notability. Give me 31, and I’m not going to ready any of them. Please list the best three on the talk page.

Sourcream13 (talk · contribs), at 31 references, they are too many. Which are the WP:THREE best? SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for advice. I have deleted some references. Also a lot of articles are in Serbian language. Hope this is not a problem, since is always google translate extension on Chrome. Cheers! 11CBLOK (talk) 01:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@11CBLOK no need to delete any refs to gain acceptance. What we do need is for you to help us identify the WP:THREE best sources. Please list them below and we will review. ~Kvng (talk) 02:19, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]