Talk:Tasmin Lucia-Khan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

BBC

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Bangladesh Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

60 second update at 23.00 on the 14th January 2009

Did anybody else hear what I heard? No? Davu.leon (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not me, but I think I know what you're talking about. I suspect this incident has received enough coverage to be worthy of inclusion here. Open4D (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naked Modelling

I know many muslims who built this page will not be happy abput it, but it is still part of life. Can we include it? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3082604/Raunchy-secret-of-telly-news-girl-Tasmin-Khan.html Reaper7 (talk) 12:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the first photo in your link. I think it is photoshop :) --85.102.117.32 (talk) 15:55, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's all over the British press, and the Sun newspaper for better or worse is a WP:RS. Whether it is encyclopedic is another question, but verifiability is easily met.KD Tries Again (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2010 (UTC)KD Tries Again[reply]

If its now in the Daily Mail when she has sold her story to them in a counter-spin, then I can't see how we can't include it? Plus The Sun is WP:RS. All refs from all publications also confirms her full and correct name, although Pointer1 has got in a right tissy about the whole thing - some of his edits appear blatant fact removal, and some pure publicity/beyond an encyclopaedia. Are the photo's encyclopaedic - on reflection probably not, but we can hardly leave the ref out when it confirms her name. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 15:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "tissy"? Can't find that in my dictionary. Pointer1 (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Education???

Just noticed something: we have a half-complete tag box in this article for Oxford Brookes University. The refs seems to suggest and support that she attended the University of Oxford, but I can't find a college name. The tag was changed by an anon on August 5th, 2010. Anyone have a ref that supports either conclusively? A college normally sorts this out easily. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 15:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of Walker2005

I have checked through the edits of Walker2005, and it heavily biased towards this article. I have hence placed a tag on the main article, and requested clarification of their relationship to Ms Khan. Rgds,--Trident13 (talk) 23:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is no relationship between Ms khan and myself. I am someone who watches a lot of news and I have followed her career for the last few years. Trident, you have blatently put up unencyclopaedic material, as I too have checked your edits. These have been reverted by Pointer1 and other users. I think we need to stay factual. Name change- fair enough, but you wanted to edit in sensational tabloid material regarding nake private pictures. That's hardly encyclopaedic. Rgds,--Walker2005 00:52, 13 August 2010

At last, some communication - thank you! The Sun is accepted as WP:RS - see the above discussion. Plus it confirms her name, as well as the article she then got her agent to spin into the Daily Mail. Therefore its acceptable to include it, although we have agreed to not mention the incident directly. Pointer1 is trying to remove both The Sun ref and the title summary of the Daily Mail ref, both of which are in convention of WP:REF policy. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 23:58, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pointer1 is not "trying to remove both The Sun ref and the title summary of the Daily Mail ref". I suggest you actually look at the edits made by Pointer1 before making such wild accusations. No such refs have been removed by Pointer1! Pointer1 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit semi request

{{Edit semi-protected}} Please make the following minor improvements:

In the infobox, change birthname to Farhana Tasmin Lucia Khan, so that it corresponds to what's in the article.
In Tasmin Lucia Khan#Broadcasting career, change "She has covered some of the biggest showbiz news stories for the BBC, including the deaths of Michael Jackson" to "She has covered some of the biggest showbiz news stories for the BBC, including the deaths of Michael Jackson (i.e. since the topic is his death, make the wikilink for Jackson's name be to the article "death of Michael Jackson").
For Tasmin Lucia Khan#References, replace the entire section with the following:

References

Tasmin Lucia Khan BBC Press Office, August 2010

Please add Category:Year of birth missing (living people) to the bottom of the article.

That's all I ask. Semi-protecting this article for six months was harsh. If someone is feeling brave (Deskana: "Oversight based action. You must not undo this protection without my approval"), unprotect the article and I'll make these minor changes myself. Thanks. 67.100.126.148 (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Done All 4 points done. Several edits to the article needed to be oversighted, meaning something serious was going on in this article and thus was protected. How about you sign up with an account? Thanks, Stickee (talk) 02:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Llitigation

From 2016 to 2018, Tasmin Lucia-Khan was embroiled in litigation with Ryan Wiik, who hired her as the CEO of WR Entertainment. Variety writes, "The story made front-page headlines in Norway, where the business press chronicled each bizarre twist in the saga."[1] As an encyclopedia we summarize rather than chronicling every twist and turn, but it is bizarre (and WP:POV) that article Ryan Wiik contains four paragraphs about the litigation, but this article doesn't include a word about him or the legal battles between the two of them. Potential sources include:[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]