Talk:Taseko Mines

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV tag re Prosperity Mine coverage

Given the amount of media coverage about this mine and surrounding controversy, seeing a bare-bones section with the one biased comment "Taseko President Russell Hallbauer sends a letter to Environment Minister Peter Kent suggesting that the proposal was rejected for "spiritual" rather than environmental reasons" only took me aback. I created a Prosperity Mine redirect to this article just now, but seems like should be a separate article, or this section needs considerable expansion to adequately and impartially cover the controversies and politicking. Because of the amount of that, the separate article seems to be called for ratther than expanding this page...which so far is all sales-pitch info, though I didn't add the "advert" tag (yet).Skookum1 (talk) 06:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]