Talk:Tasang Dam

Dams High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Myanmar Low‑importance

Tasang Dam is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

[Untitled]

This article appears to be a student's essay and needs to be reformatted. The articles size can be cut in half and it should look much like other dam articles. Also, information on the Salween River should be put in the proper article. All of the negative impacts of the dam can simply be put into a one or two headers about controversy. In addition, the information could be cited and written better to remove bias. Every dam has its own problems and I am not saying this dam is like the others but a more concise article without direct conclusions should be made. See the Grand Coulee Dam.--Sanorton (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updated article and made it as inline as possible with Wiki standards. Please feel free to add more info and update article.--Sanorton (talk) 21:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mongton Dam?

Apparently the dam may have been renamed. I don't think this source is reliable enough to warrant inclusion in the article yet but it is worth keeping an eye on.--NortyNort (Holla) 01:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]