Talk:Tarzan, the Ape Man (1981 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Media franchises Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

In popular media

why is there an incredibly, way, way too detailed description of some anime at the end of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3BD8:4D90:41EE:94BE:2777:B207 (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better? -- Pemilligan (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tarzanyell.jpg

Image:Tarzanyell.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why bother? This was one of the worst, most mediocre and stupid films ever made! --AVM (talk) 01:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Film co-writer

For some reason (possibly because he has no Wikipedia article?) the film's co-writer, Gary Goddard, was omitted from the article, even though his name is even on the poster used to illustrate this piece! I have restored his name, and also added a Production section featuring information from an article on Goddard printed in a recent issue of Filmfax, a major film history magazine with international distribution. I mention this because IP edits often get removed without cause, so if the stuff I mention is no longer there, someone else can restore it from the article history. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 00:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]