Talk:Targeted therapy of lung cancer

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Importance Scale Rating

Personally, and with all due respect, I strongly feel that this article deserves a High Importance rating. Anyone care to discuss this?

With best regards: Cliff L. Knickerbocker, MS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uploadvirus (talk • contribs) 08:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Many of the sources are primary. Medical articles should be based on Reviews and other secondary sources, per wp:MEDRS.LeadSongDog come howl! 01:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources are preferred but primary sources can/should be usable with care if not covered by a suitable secondary source ? - Rod57 (talk) 03:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good secondary source

The Promise of Personalized Medicine in NSCLC: Prime Time or Premature? Dec 2012 discusses recent trials. - Rod57 (talk) 03:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]