Talk:Tara Teng/GA2
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article most definitely does meet the neutrality requirement of the criteria, frankly it appears to be a fansite. Kelly hi! 23:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know Tara Teng from a Tara tree but I recommended this article be sent to re-assessment back in February as the original review was slapdash. It would be good if we can get Cactusjackbangbang and Johnnydowns back, as they already had a go at pruning a substantial amount of puffery out of the article before it was all reverted for no real reason. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like I chased them away a little while back (see above). Oops... sorry... ;)(But seriously, maybe I'll have a go at cutting all the crap out.) epic genius (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- While I agree that delisting of this article is needed (way too much crap trimmed and needs re-evaluation), the GA icon is not supposed to be removed from the article DURING a reassessment. sst✈discuss 13:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've restored the icon... for now. epic genius (talk) 22:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've removed it. the article was 73,000 bytes when it was GAed [1]. It has been gutted since then and is currently at 14,000 bytes; since there's no comparison between the two it cannot retain that status until re-assessed. Softlavender (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Closing as delisted. It has been removed from the relevant GA list almost two weeks ago. What a mess. sst✈discuss 05:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- I've removed it. the article was 73,000 bytes when it was GAed [1]. It has been gutted since then and is currently at 14,000 bytes; since there's no comparison between the two it cannot retain that status until re-assessed. Softlavender (talk) 11:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)