Jump to content

Talk:Tao Jiali

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sources

[edit]

This article is very poorly sourced. There is adequate evidence presented that China expressed an intention to recruit female astronaut candidates; evidence is also presented that Tao Jiali is a female fighter pilot; but the only evidence for Tao being an astronaut candidate is an amateurish web page. If she had been announced as a candidate, there should be a formal government statement as evidence of the fact.

I am therefore going to remove statements relating to Tao's supposed selection as an astronaut candidate for China. RandomCritic (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is the point of this post?

[edit]

Without causing offence, I wish to protest against this page. The person that this page describes is unimportant, how will this information benefit an Englishman, American, Frenchman etc. The woman isn't even the only female pilot in the Chinese Air force!!!!! How could you write a page like this whilst other things which would be deemed important weren't? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle25157 (talkcontribs) 07:29, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tao Jiali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]