Jump to content

Talk:Tanera Mòr

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why do we have to tolerate the OS's mangling of Gaidhlig names? Just because they had an inability to handle that language doesn't mean that it should be the case in the modern world. Some of these names make absolutely no sense with English spellings. --MacRusgail 19:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sympathise, but I can't consent to using Gaelic spellings. Perhaps the blame for any transmogrificiation lies with the OS, but language is surely a fluid rather than a static phenomenon. The sources quoted by the article all use the common English spelling and we should follow. We defer to the elder language of the gaels in noting the spelling in that tongue, but we can't use it as an alternate throughout on the English Wikipedia. 'Tanera' may jar in Gaelic, but it makes just as much 'sense' in English as 'Tannara'. In any case, as I know to my cost, even when the modern Gaelic name is known, the meaning and original spelling is sometimes lost. (See for example Talk:Dubh Artach). Ben MacDui (Talk) 21:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tanera Mòr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]