Talk:Tammie Jo Shults

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tammie Jo Shults article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Draft:Tammie Jo Shults was copied or moved into Tammie Jo Shults with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 April 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

A fact from Tammie Jo Shults appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 July 2018, and was viewed approximately 26,176 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Tammie Jo Shults (pictured), captain of Southwest Airlines Flight 1380, was one of the first female fighter pilots in the US Navy?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tammie Jo Shults.

Wikipedia

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

Military history: Aviation / Biography / North America / United States / Cold War / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red

This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

United States: 50,000 Challenge

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Photo is not copyvio

I reached out to the MidAmerica Nazarene University PR department and asked permission to use the current photo under a CC-BY-SA license. Carol Best, the PR officer for the university, emailed me back and granted use under the license. All I did was crop the photo and upload it. Please do not delete it as a copyvio; it isn't. Glad she has her page now.--Brad Patrick (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@BradPatrick: Sorry but I nominated the image for deletion at Commons because it did not seem to have the claimed CC licence. Getting legal permission properly registered is a pain – see Commons:OTRS#If_you_are_NOT_the_copyright_holder. I've been trying to help another group get an image of Maria Jastrzębska loaded but it has been deleted twice so far. If you don't observe the formalities then that's what happens, alas. Andrew D. (talk) 17:38, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BradPatrick: I'm sure someone will nominate [1] again for deletion. Comment's be uploaders might not be viewed as authentic, and not everyone knows you're a wiki admin and did get permission to post. There is a process to get it verified [2] to avoid future copyvio issues. Bohbye (talk) 20:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback. Copyright/Copyvio process formalization is not something I have kept up with. In the spirit of WP:BOLD, I occasionally reach out in person to try to free images where I think someone rational might be willing to help. Please remember the rest of the known universe could not care less about satisfying procedural requirements on Commons; our goal is to build a better encyclopedia. In this case, I simply reached out to the nice folks at the University and they were willing to acknowledge the photo under a copyleft license. Good for us!--Brad Patrick (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Born "around 1962" (?)

Can't anybody find a source for her actual birth year (better yet, birth date)? I've tried, but not too hard. —2606:A000:1126:4CA:0:98F2:CFF6:1782 (talk) 00:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion: first cohort of female F/A-18 Hornet pilots or just first female F/A-18 Hornet pilots

Hi @WWGB and @Udas, I realize that you have disagreement on whether to add "cohort" or not. I was about to undo @WWGB's revision revid=837817629, and but then just realized it was an undo already. So I want to do a discussion here to seek if we can reach an edit consensus:

@WWGB, the source you cite: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article209178274.html actually wrote in the first paragraph

The Southwest pilot hailed as a hero for landing a crippled Southwest plane was among the first female fighter pilots to serve in the U.S. Navy.

Which seems to me was a summary of a citation from the Navy statement

She was "among the first cohort of women pilots to transition to tactical aircraft," said Navy spokeswoman Christina Sears in a statement.

and from a classmate's Cindy Foster

Foster said that not only was Shults among the first female fighter pilots, she was the first woman to fly an F/A-18 Hornet for the Navy.

It seems to me keeping the cohort maintains the accuracy of Navy statement. And to what extend the accuracy of a single individual's quotation will distinguish cohort or not remains unclear.

What do you think?

Xinbenlv (talk) 18:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, IMHO especially for a page about a living person, the source has to be quite hard to refute. My vote is for "cohort", in agreement with Xinbenlv. I do understand that Foster, the batch mate, does have a claim to Capt. Shults being the first.

U Das (talk) 07:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to "one of the first", don't need the verbosity of the word "cohort". WWGB (talk) 07:29, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with "one of the first", accurate and still identifying the sense of significance. Xinbenlv (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Navy: She was "among the first cohort of women pilots to transition to tactical aircraft," said Navy spokeswoman Christina Sears in a statement. So we confirm she was amongst the first in tactical aircraft. They didn't mention the F-18, because obviously, they have additional tactical aircraft besides the F-18. So if the classmate says "that not only was Shults among the first female fighter pilots, she was the first woman to fly an F/A-18 Hornet for the Navy", is that not reliable enough to confirm "first to fly" the F-18? Bohbye (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Over-quotation

This article contains quotations longer than necessary. The entire §Military Fly Moms and §Reactions sections are dominated by large quotes. This could just as easily be treated in original prose that does not include original research if we simply summarize the content of the sources. I have tagged this page with a template for that reason. Flytilega (talk) 20:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 00:20, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too, let's remove the bloat quotes. WWGB (talk) 23:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, we don't need so many quotes. U Das (talk) 03:40, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. The quotes are excessively long. I try to limit quotes to two or three sentences, carefully selected to convey something that cannot be summarized easily. This biography has block quotes of eleven, eight and four sentences. Most of that content can easily be summarized instead. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As long that the quotes don’t get cut too short, and still make sense as quotes, i’m fine with shortening them. Bohbye (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Y I trimmed the quotes as part of the DYK process. Andrew D. (talk) 06:52, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Contained or uncontained engine failure?

In this article it says in the summary that Soutwest 1380 suffered an "uncontained" engine failure. However, on the wikipedia page of the incident itself (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwest_Airlines_Flight_1380) it says in the first sentence that it was a "contained" engine failure. Which one is correct? The other one should be changed. 2001:9E8:5FF:D000:55A5:3AA5:943B:41FE (talk) 11:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]